To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=39756
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 26 11:01:23 -0800 2005 ------- > The splitting of the core package has been done for smaller update rpms. Ahh, I see. And I'm looking forward to see updates for OOo :-) > I will try to use the process ID as a unique identifier. Use whatever suits the build-process :-) (Specifying %name-%verion-$$ does not work because the different stages (%prep, %build, %install,..) as different processes, but passing it over to rpm using --define "id $$" will do) > I am also playing with the idea of having the menu packages share the trigger > script, so that they stay in sync. The easiest way would be to cat spec file > particles together. What do you think ? You mean having a Makefile cat together the specfile? Why not.. But I would not use cat, but a skeleton spec that contains something like "<post_mime_goes_here>" that will be replaced by the actual script (you can use sed or something similar to do that). This way it will be easier to handle than having to look in the makefile each time to see what parts will be places where... --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
