To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73154
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 14:11:54 +0000 2007 ------- Are we certain that the last proposed changes, to add "Unchanged OpenOffice.org" and the text explaining that BrOo is the same as OOo and had to be renamed for legal reasons, bear no risk for the product? I am no lawyer either, but mentioning the brand name OpenOffice.org again, albeit in a smaller font, still means that the brand name was not removed. AFAIK the minimum requirement would be to change the product name from "OpenOffice.org" to "BrOffice.org" with an otherwise unchanged intro bitmap. If we only did this change, then we know we would be on the safe side. Why don't we just try to implement this one change first and then in a later step implement additional changes, as soon as all legal matters for these changes are clarified? Does this make sense? --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
