To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4040
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 12 20:23:59 +0000 2007 ------- Why is it assigned to "requirements"? It looks like requirements are clear. Is it because no developer has taken this issue? I bet some of those that have provided solutions as add ons (like the one from Paolo Mantovani) would not have a problem giving the code for inclusion on OO.org Or am I wrong in this Paolo? Or are there really more requirements that the example solution don't cover? If we have the solution already the inclusion should be easy for a current OO.org developer that stops it? So, is it really a lack of requirement or the lack of a developer that takes this issue that --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
