To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=71856
User darkcloud changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Status|CLOSED |UNCONFIRMED
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WORKSFORME |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 14 07:58:10 +0000
2007 -------
"Well, the problem here might be the meaning of "too short". <...>
(Originally, it were less than 75 characters, that's why the original report.)"
Yes, indeed. The problem is here.
"I doubt that we should increase the Title field length even more. 75 seems to
be a good compromise so that most people will find this sufficient. Those who
don't (like you, drorlev), are free to increase the field length themself. (F4
in Writer, "Edit database file" at the "Bibliography" entry, "Tables" at the
left hand side, "Edit" in the context menu of "biblio".)"
Thanks for F4 button, i did not know that :)
Hey, could you please explain whats the rational of not making the Title field
255? I mean, i see no rational in restricting it's size to 75. Does the size
of the database concern? or is it some other reasion we do not know?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
