To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=73693
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 30 13:04:58 +0000 2007 ------- My understanding is that file extension is defined with the ".", not the amount of letters. For example Mac OS X can have "foo.applescript", with the .applescript correctly identified as an extension. Thus, I thought soffice-bin would be treated as extensionless thing. Even if the "-bin" -extension would be specific to the OOo universe, are we shooting our foot? I could imagine stuff silently breaking with Mac or non-Mac platforms adding files like flash-bin-image.dat --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
