To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81252
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 6 13:10:29 +0000 2007 ------- Thanks for the quick reply. I've mulled it over a bit, and can't really think of anything better than your suggestion. I was originally thinking that perhaps the $(expanded_recipe_command) could be picked apart into its constituent pieces with proper regard for quoting, and then explicitly stuck back together in some appropriate way once we know what we've got. There is a perl module that plays these sorts of games: see the split_like_sheel() function in ExtUtils::CBuilder::Platform::Windows if you're familiar with perl. However, that all depends on the shell being cmd.exe as well, so it's no better than your (much simpler!) solution. So I think a couple of new special macros would be fine. Would they be set to a sensible default (i.e. assuming cmd.exe behaviour) for Win32 users, e.g. in startup/win95/macros.mk? That way, my binary distributions would work out-of-the-box for users with a cmd.exe shell. Users with other fancy shells would (possibly) have to edit their startup files to set a value appropriate to their shell, but that doesn't really bother me. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
