To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=86582
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 26 17:03:30 +0000 2008 ------- found a lot more problems with compiler generated default ctors. Seems that our gcc on Linux is even more picky than the MSVC++ was as the code built on Windows but not on Linux. I reintroduced the removed declarations of non-default ctors so that the compiler does not try to create a default ctor. But I didn't revive their implementations. So in a further step all these classes can be removed, but I didn't want tot do that as this would have hold back the CWS even longer. Caolan, it seems that you already did the cvs remove for the listed files?! --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
