To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20370
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 13 06:43:10 +0000 2008 ------- insount: the difference between an embedded image and a embedded font is that, usually, the former is a *part* of the content, while the latter is an *attribute* of the content. Users pay different legal attention to these elements. Technically, it's well explained in the OpenDocument specifications and it's also a logical valid argument, in this case. Then, there are also documents, i.e. trade logos or artistic drawings, in which the *visual representation* of a font - not the font itself - may be part of the content. In those cases, the legal concerns are completely different and less important for the average users, since they should have or have had a professional legal support that explains what can or cannot do with their logo's "representation". I have no power to block or unblock this issue, but i'd prefer not to add another element for which I have to check the license, especially if that addition is automatically done by a software application and it may be not clearly evident for the embedder or other users of a document(read: me) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
