To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=101354
User sus changed the following:
What |Old value |New value
================================================================================
Ever confirmed| |1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Oct 14 06:31:25 +0000
2009 -------
If ODF 1.1 it is not allowed, why shall the XHTML export being fixed?
As it is an XHTML export, would not a HTML validness problem a reason for fix?
Perhaps I am getting something completely wrong, could you try to explain me the
problem in other words?
Thanks in advance!
Svante
PS: You got an interesting list test document, which reveals weaknesses of the
indentation and numbering in the XHTML, this is surely an list issue (-> status
NEW).
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@xml.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@xml.openoffice.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
