To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791





------- Additional comments from s...@openoffice.org Wed Mar  3 21:30:33 +0000 
2010 -------
@rene:  A few things come to mind:
1  libs.mk CPPUNITLIB:  For one, shouldn't the check for SYSTEM_CPPUNIT come 
before the check for WNT 
(so that WNT could, at least in principle, also use SYSTEM_CPPUNIT)?  For 
another, the "+=" in "CPPUNITLIB 
+= $(CPPUNIT_LIBS)" is probably a typo.  (And for a third, wouldn't it be 
better to replace CPPUNITLIB with 
CPPUNIT_LIBS everywhere and set it in libs.mk only if not SYSTEM_CPPUNIT?)
2  What looks odd is that only sal/cppunittester/makefile.mk mentions 
CPPUNIT_CFLAGS, not the other 
makefiles that reference cppunit.  (And again, wouldn't it be better if the 
CFLAGS+=CPPUNIT_CFLAGS 
would be unconditional, and CPPUNIT_CFLAGS were set empty for the 
non-SYSTEM_CPPUNIT case in some 
solenv/inc/*.mk?)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org

Reply via email to