To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=109791
------- Additional comments from r...@openoffice.org Wed Mar 3 21:46:01 +0000 2010 ------- > Wanted to do it minimal-invasive, but we can do, yes. Besides that, we do that for other system-*, too (see the libxslt right below cppunit), so for consistency we should do it like in the initial patch IMHO > 2 What looks odd is that only sal/cppunittester/makefile.mk mentions > CPPUNIT_CFLAGS, not the other makefiles that reference cppunit. Do they need the includes (And it would for me either way as /usr/include is a standard path and this /usr/include/cppunit/* is found anyway without -I); cppunittester of course needs headers, the other occurances in sal are just linkages afaics. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@tools.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
