To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=49590
------- Additional comments from b_michael...@openoffice.org Tue Apr 13 08:40:11 +0000 2010 ------- Had a walk, changed my mind: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/ /usr/lib/browser-plugins/ should be enough for everybody. If a distro installs plugins in MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME/plugins of their product, they need to make sure to symlink /usr/lib/browser-plugins/ accordingly. I see no scenario, where /usr/lib/browser-plugins/ exists and is not containing all the available plugins. So unless Fedora/RH are doing something extremely funky, the two paths should be enough and the can of worms can be kept closed. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@framework.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@framework.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: allbugs-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: allbugs-h...@openoffice.org
