At Fri, 6 Sep 2002 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT), Guilhem Tardy wrote: > > Hi, > > snd_pcm_hardware_t is NOT pre-initialized, and drivers are responsible to > define ALL fields necessary. This is too bad, because it essentially means that > a new constraint (i.e. period_size_min + period_size_max) will need to be > supported by all drivers.
well, but drivers supporting G72x are very rare. then why bother to change the common code to affect every driver? > > I have tested successfully such a new constraint (patch in attachment), and > hope that you'll incorporate it in the cvs anyway. it'd be better to add the constraint only if the period_size_min and max are non-zero, since most of drivers do NOT want to use this constraint. the similar should be applied to the period_bytes constraint if we add period_size constraint, because they may conflict with each other. ciao, Takashi ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Alsa-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/alsa-devel
