Sure... but it couldn't unload the AppDomain, because it belongs to
NUnit and NUnit would find that rather surprising. :-) Rather, it
could create a separate AppDomain, run the test and then unload it.

Charlie

On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:29 AM, liortal53 <liorta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was not suggesting to give tests access to modify the environment.
>
> I was referring to the 2nd option you mentioned -- having some sort of
> an attribute or similar approach, to inform the test runner that it
> should unload the appdomain prior to executing the test.
>
> On Mar 6, 7:43 pm, Charlie Poole <nunit...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Lior,
>>
>> This is only possible if you do it yourself in your tests. As you can
>> imagine, it would be chaos if tests were allowed to change the overall
>> NUnit environment.
>>
>> Allowing selected tests to run in their own AppDomain using an
>> attribute is certainly possible as a feature, but would have to be
>> prioritized. If you decide to request it, please address it to the 3.0
>> project athttp://launcpad.net/nunit-3.0since we won't be adding
>> significant features to NUnit 2.6.
>>
>> Charlie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:10 AM, liortal53 <liorta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>>
>> > I am trying to create a few test methods that will verify whether
>> > certain assemblies have been loaded (or NOT loaded into memory after
>> > my App's initialization).
>>
>> > This seems to work on its own, however when i run all my tests (which
>> > are contained in a single assembly), the assemblies i am testing if
>> > loaded or not are loaded beforehand by other tests, and remain in
>> > memory (in the AppDomain that is created by the test runner).
>>
>> > Is there any easy way to avoid this ? (without creating my own
>> > AppDomain for every test, etc).
>>
>> > What i would like is to assure that before running any test, the
>> > AppDomain that is currently loaded will be unloaded, or in short to
>> > create an AppDomain per test method (or per methods that i will
>> > specify).
>>
>> > Is this possible?
>>
>> > Thanks
>> > Lior
>>
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> > "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
>> > To post to this group, send email to altnetseattle@googlegroups.com.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> > altnetseattle+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> > For more options, visit this group 
>> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
> To post to this group, send email to altnetseattle@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> altnetseattle+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Seattle area Alt.Net" group.
To post to this group, send email to altnetseattle@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
altnetseattle+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/altnetseattle?hl=en.

Reply via email to