On 06/28/2014 12:55 AM, Songhaibin (A) wrote:
However, I also suspect that the privacy concerns on *provisioned*
access bandwidth are still intact since they will tend to point to
subscribers that are outliers.
I'm not sure I understand this sentence due to my poor English. By
"outlier" do you mean some exceptional/abnormal provisioned bandwidth
value bound to an endpoint property?
Haibin: Your English is excellent, and yes, that is what I meant.
If the endpoints with higher provisioned access bandwidth would be
pointed more often than other endpoints, you imply the privacy
concern is: those endpoints do not want to be recognized?
It's more than those endpoints don't want to be recognized, the question
is: has the subscriber corresponding to the endpoint provided consent
to allow his/her provisioned bandwidth to be distributed by ALTO?
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurb...@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
