Dear ALTOs, On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Adrian Farrel <adr...@olddog.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi again Richard, > > > > We are in no rush. It is better to have some considered and structured > text in March than hurried text later today. > > > > It will be interesting to debate the formation of the TED and LSP-DB using > ALTO. I believe this discussion starts to overlap with your potential > rechartering and needs to be resolved through a discussion with the Routing > Area. that does not mean: > > - ALTO is the wrong protocol for this > > - we should not discuss it in this document > > > > We do, however, have to draw a careful line between what can be done and > what could be done. > > > > Looking forward to seeing text. > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > I don't know that I ever saw actual text sent in response to Adrian's request for help on this, which wouldn't be surprising if the conversation went off list, but I wanted to make sure you folks knew the draft is on this week's telechat agenda, and mentions ALTO in a number of places. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrkingel-pce-abno-architecture-15 I don't see anything that seems wrong to me, but you guys are the experts on this, so if you see anything i should know about before the telechat Thursday, especially if it would change my No Objection ballot, please respond Real Soon Now. Thanks, Spencer, as one of the balloting ADs
_______________________________________________ alto mailing list alto@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto
