Hello Kai, Qin, all,

Thanks a lot for your comments/answers,

See below more details about our PoC & correlation:

Given a set of applications/media services (e.g., Disney+, DAZN, etc.) that use infrastructures (e.g., CDNs) for content distribution, a couple of questions to try to solve with this PoC:

 * What are those infrastructures and how much traffic is coming from them?
 * What are those applications and how much traffic is coming from them?

Therefore, the main idea with the DNS and Netflow correlation (including BGP) is to annotate the Netflow traffic with the domain name(s) they came from.

Regarding DNS information, we are collecting A/4A records and CName records:

 * A/4A records to map an IPv4/IPv6 address to a FQDN (Fully Qualified
   Domain Name).
 * CNAME records to map a FQDN to another FQDN.

Main technical/research challenges for this DNS/Netflow mapping include:

 * Live processing with multiple DNS and Netflow pipes running in parallel
 * Domain name and IP address aggregation
 * Desynchronized Netflow/DNS streams, including different formats
 * DNS records need to be tracked in order to know if they are still
   valid or not
 * Warm-up periods of more than 12 hours
 * Recursive CNAME mapping (and sometimes endless)
 * Recursive lookup of FQDNs is not always completed because we only
   receive the “cache misses” in the DNS stream data
 * ...

We are implementing our PoC environment to validate and obtain different proposals and results.

This is a work-in-progress and we are fully open to discuss in more details this project, and working together with people interested in this topic.


btw, regarding how the correlated data is consumed by applications, it is supposed to use the same approach like FlowDirector (https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/112/materials/slides-112-alto-implementation-deployment-experience-update-01), i.e.,  through ALTO-based interfaces, BGP-based interfaces, or customized interfaces.


On 18.05.22 13:05, kai...@scu.edu.cn wrote:

Hi Qin, Danny and all,


Sorry I did not get the email from Danny and just saw this discussion. Please see my comments inline.


Best,

Kai



    -----Original Messages-----
    *From:*"Qin Wu" <bill...@huawei.com>
    *Sent Time:*2022-05-18 13:07:36 (Wednesday)
    *To:* "Danny Lachos" <dlac...@benocs.com>, "Jordi Ros Giralt"
    <j...@qti.qualcomm.com>, "kai...@scu.edu.cn" <kai...@scu.edu.cn>,
    "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>
    *Cc:*
    *Subject:* RE: [alto] 5/3/2022 Meeting Minutes

    Hi, Danny:

    Interesting PoC, any more details about your PoC introduction. I
    am wondering what technique you are using for data correlation,
    how these correlated information are consumed by the application?
    I assume these steps do not require extension to Network Map or
    Cost Map.

    -Qin

    *发件人:*alto [mailto:alto-boun...@ietf.org] *代表 *Danny Lachos
    *发送时间:*2022年5月10日2:38
    *收件人:*Jordi Ros Giralt <j...@qti.qualcomm.com>; kai...@scu.edu.cn;
    alto@ietf.org
    *主题:*Re: [alto] ?==?utf-8?q? ?==?utf-8?q? 5/3/2022 Meeting Minutes

    Hello Jordi, Kai, all

    Thanks a lot for sharing,

    I have a couple of quick comments/questions:

    Regarding the OpenALTO meetings [0], I saw that Kai is currently
    working on integrate ALTO in DNS. If I do not wrong, it is
    supposed to use ALTO as a northbound interface to provide
    information about the domain name resolution to DNS clients,
    right?, if not, there is a chance to explain a little bit more
    about what is being done on ALTO/DNS?


There are two directions. One is to provide ALTO information through DNS and the other is to use ALTO to feed information to a DNS server. The first direction is definitely an interesting and potentially useful direction but we haven't got the man power to work on that. Right now we are using ALTO information to change the order of A records returned by a DNS server. The current proof-of-concept is to update the sort list option [1] based on ALTO cost map. Another approach in this direction is to change the preferences of A records of the same host name on the client side but we also haven't really started yet.


To put the integration into a context, you may refer to the footprint paper (NSDI'16). The idea is to control user traffic through DNS remapping. However, I'm looking more in the case where the application is not in the same administrative domain as the underlying network provider, and the ALTO maps are constructed based on my NAI'21 paper instead of from the ISP.


[1] http://www.ipamworldwide.com/ipam/sortlist.html

    Here at Benocs, we are also working with DNS information that is
    correlated with network traffic flows to obtain a
    multi-dimensional traffic information. In fact, we are
    implementing a PoC environment for the development of practical
    use cases. This PoC is able to read DNS traffic, network traffic
    flows, BGP information and then making correlations (real-time or
    batch processing).

This sounds very interesting. Like Qin's comment, I would be very interested to hear more about the use cases and how you make the correlations.

    In some point, could be interesting to find some kind of
    interception about what you/we are currently dealing in terms of
    technical and/or scientific challenges.

Certainly.

    On 04.05.22 14:12, Jordi Ros Giralt wrote:

        Thank you very much Jensen for taking meeting minutes yesterday.

        For those who could not attend our call yesterday (and for our
        bookkeeping), here you will find them:
        
https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/wg-materials/blob/main/meetings-ietf-alto/ietf-alto-2022.md

        Going forward, you will also find minutes for the OpenALTO
        meetings being held weekly too (Mon, Wed and Thu) here:
        
https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/wg-materials/blob/main/meetings-ietf-alto/ietf-openalto-2022.md.
        As you know, everyone is invited to attend these other
        meetings that focus on the implementation of the Standard, see
        the meeting coordinates in this previous link for days and
        zoom link.

        This action resolves ticket
        https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/wg-materials/issues/23

        Thanks,

        Jordi on behalf of ALTO WG

        _______________________________________________

        alto mailing list

        alto@ietf.org

        https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

--
    Best regards,

    Dr.-Ing. Danny Lachos

    BENOCS GMBH

    www.benocs.com <http://www.benocs.com>

    [0]
    
https://github.com/ietf-wg-alto/wg-materials/blob/main/meetings-ietf-alto/ietf-openalto-2022.md

--
Best regards,

Dr.-Ing. Danny Lachos
BENOCS GMBH
www.benocs.com
_______________________________________________
alto mailing list
alto@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

Reply via email to