On Fri, 09 Feb 2001, Ryan Williams wrote:
> > Perhaps it would help the two of you. Perhaps you can explain why
> > the rest of us should be inconvenienced because you can't spare the
> > time to learn to use the right tool for the right job? 200 m/day might
> > be a burden for you. For many of us that's a light day. The list
> > messages are already tagged in the Sender: header. Please learn to
> > use it.
>
> Who is to say that we would be the ones inconveniencing others. If everyone
> but you wants this, you would be inconveniencing us to ask that it was not
> done. I was just placing out an idea when I suggested this just to get some
> feed back and to see what other people thought about this. We all know your
> opinion about the matter now how about we hear some other peoples opinions.
I can see where it would help if you didn't have some way to filter mail, but
mostly the Sender: header is correct. The only times I have trouble with that
is when an email is sent directly to me, and not the list.
Also, just to note, I would like (hope, pray, etc.) that Subjects become more
descriptive of what's in the message. Wading through 100's of "Question:" or
"ARGH! HELP ME" messages for something useful is difficult to say the least.
--
Jason Hollinden
SMG Systems Admin
