On Mon, 3 Dec 2001 at 11:56am, Rafe Thayer wrote

> Hi Folks,
>   Another question for ya.  After I did an amdump to test out dumping our
> disks to tape, I tried to do an amrecover to see if restoring the data
> would work.  It seems to work for our linux machines, but the solaris box
> has some trouble.  When I start up amrecover, it reports:
> ...
> 200 Config set to imash.
> 501 No index records for host: hostname.  Invalid?
> Trying hostname.domainname...
> 200 Dump host set to hostname.domainname
> ...
> 
> 
> Then I do a setdisk /etc and it reports:
> 
> 200 Disk set to /etc.
> No index records for disk for specified date
> If date correct, notify system administrator
> 
> So I figured that the index must not have been created for some reason,
> but I checked that out on the server and it looks fine.  Has the right
> permissions and ownership.  The wierd thing is, if I look into the index
> files for the host that's giving me trouble, they look a little different
> than the others. It looks like this:
> 
> 06573011000/./security/dev/audio
> 06573011000/./security/dev/fd0
> 06573011000/./security/dev/sr0
> 06573011000/./security/dev/st0
> 06573011000/./security/dev/st1
> ...
> 
> Whereas for the linux hosts, the index looks like this:
> 
> /
> /CORBA/
> /CORBA/servers/
> /X11/
> ...
> 
> (these are just the contents of /etc on each host).  The version of tar on
> the solaris machine is 1.13.  I've heard tar can cause some problems.  Do
> you think that might be it?
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> Rafe
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University

Reply via email to