haha . got caught in the reply-to myself just now and didn't send it to the
list.

I would like to see a subject tag. Perhaps [AMANDA] or something shorter:).
When browsing email, it allows for sorting by subject for those of us who
don't want to sort by To: (which can be misleading, as one CAN carbon copy
the list, or even bcc the list).

Anthony

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Baker-LePain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Galen Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 8:29 AM
Subject: Re: reply-to in mailing list


> On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 8:41am, Galen Johnson wrote
>
> > I've had a thunk regarding the list...would it be possible to set it up
> > so the list actually inserts a 'Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > header.  This would make it so the default reply (rather than reply to
> > all) goes to the list.  This would also make the archives a bit more
> > complete since us lazy users that forget to "reply to all" would start
> > posting the solutions to the list directly (kinda like having to opt out
> > rather than in).
> >
> > I'm pretty sure majordomo should be able to handle this but my
> > experience lies with mailman so I can't speak from experience.
>
> What is it recently with so much religion being discussed on this list?
> Tar/dump, hard/soft compression, spam, reply-to?  Furrfu.  :)
>
> Seriously, this is a much debated topic in the world of mailing lists,
> with no clear best practice.  Rather than start another lengthy OT
> discussion, I vote we just leave it as is (which, btw, is the same setting
> as the majority of mailing lists out there).
>
> My $.02.
>
> --
> Joshua Baker-LePain
> Department of Biomedical Engineering
> Duke University
>

Reply via email to