On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 15:55 -0500, Eric Siegerman wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 07:21:59PM -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: > Aha, LVD! LVD is not compatible with the rest of the system unless > the rest of the system is also LVD. It is two, completely seperate > signalling methods that just happen to use the same cabling. Yes and no. From the SCSI FAQ: "[ANSI] specified that if an LVD device is designed properly, it can switch to S.E. [single-ended, i.e. "normal", SCSI] mode and operate with S.E. devices on the same bus segment." - http://h000625f788f5.ne.client2.attbi.com/scsi_faq/scsifaq.html#Generic099 So if you mix it with S.E., you lose its LVDness, e.g. you have to stick to a S.E. bus length; but you shouldn't fry any hardware. HVD (high-voltage differential, i.e. the original differential variant of SCSI) is another story completely! That is indeed flat-out incompatible with S.E. (and presumably with LVD too...) -- | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / The animal that coils in a circle is the serpent; that's why so many cults and myths of the serpent exist, because it's hard to represent the return of the sun by the coiling of a hippopotamus. - Umberto Eco, "Foucault's Pendulum"