On Sunday 11 November 2018 15:36:52 Nathan Stratton Treadway wrote:

> On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 05:25:29 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > amanda@coyote:/amandatapes/Dailys/data$ /usr/local/sbin/amadmin
> > > > Daily balance
> > > >
> > > >  due-date  #fs    orig MB     out MB   balance
> > > > ----------------------------------------------
> > > > 11/10 Sat    1       7912       3145    -78.7%
> > > > 11/11 Sun    1      10886      10886    -26.1%
> > > > 11/12 Mon    1      32963       7875    -46.6%
> > > > 11/13 Tue    1       7688       7688    -47.8%
> > > > 11/14 Wed    2      22109      22109    +50.0%
> > > > 11/15 Thu    4      75027      46623   +216.3%
> > > > 11/16 Fri    6       8257       6109    -58.6%
> > > > 11/17 Sat   29      14034       8932    -39.4%
> > > > 11/18 Sun    4      21281      16842    +14.3%
> > > > 11/19 Mon   18      34599      17188    +16.6%
> > > > ----------------------------------------------
> > > > TOTAL       67     234756     147397     14739
>
> [...]
>
> > After this mornings run, its better again:
> > amanda@coyote:/root$ /usr/local/sbin/amadmin Daily balance
> >
> >  due-date  #fs    orig MB     out MB   balance
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > 11/11 Sun    1      10886      10886    -35.8%
> > 11/12 Mon    1      32963       7875    -53.6%
> > 11/13 Tue    1       7688       7688    -54.7%
> > 11/14 Wed    2      22109      22109    +30.4%
> > 11/15 Thu    4      75027      46623   +175.0%
> > 11/16 Fri    6       8257       6109    -64.0%
> > 11/17 Sat   29      14034       8932    -47.3%
> > 11/18 Sun    4      21281      16842     -0.7%
> > 11/19 Mon   18      34599      17188     +1.4%
> > 11/20 Tue    1      49240      25295    +49.2%
> > ----------------------------------------------
> > TOTAL       67     276084     169547     16954
> >   (estimated 10 runs per dumpcycle)
> >
> > And it must be calculating the balance based on the original size,
> > not the compressed size (out MB), that growing Tuesday the 20th is
> > still on one vtape, but if unchanged, Thu 15nth will still use a 2nd
> > vtape.
>
> Comparing these two runs, I see that all the rows (the first four
> columns on each line) are the same -- except that the single DLE
> listed on 11/10 of the first run came out much larger when it was
> actually dumped last night.  (7912/3145 v.s. 49240/25295).  When you
> said "that growing Tuesday the 20th", was that an indication that you
> already expected that particular DLE (which should be easy to identify
> as the only full dump listed in last night's report) to be growing
> rapidly?
>
> (Note that the "balance" column is in fact calculated based on the
> compressed/"out MB": the "average size" of 16954 listed at the bottom
> of the "balance" column is sum-of-all-"out"-sizes/runs-per-dumpcycle
> (i.e. the average of the out-sizes), and then the balance percentile
> in each row is (today's-out-MB less average-size)/average-size.  For
> example, for 11/20, you have
>   (25295-16954) / 16954 = 0.492
> ,and for 11/16 you have
>   ( 6109-16954) / 16954 = -0.640
> , etc.)
>
> So, from these two days of "balance" reports, the takeaway is that one
> particular DLE seems to have become much bigger (3145 -> 25295 MB
> compressed size), and as a result the average dump size went up by
> 2200MB, and thus all the positive-balance days had their balance
> percentages go down a bit.  So the balance did improve, but because of
> the growth of the total backup volume rather than because of
> rescheduling any particular dump(s).
>
> Also, the fact that this one DLE grew to be larger than the average
> dump size explains why no other DLEs were promoted to last night's run
> (and thus none of the other date's rows changed at all).
>
> However, the next three days all show negative balance figures, so it
> will be interesting to see if Amanda promotes any DLEs from the 11/14,
> 11/15, or 11/19's groups to try to even the batches out a bit.
> However, the first two of those dates currently have small DLE counts,
> and 11/19 includes many DLEs but totals just slightly over the
> average, so the opportunities for rebalancing may be pretty
> limited....
>

it is an improvement, so I'm not going to try and move anything else for 
about a week just to see if it levels out better. PublicA is currently 
the 800 lb gorilla, so I may next attempt to adapt one of the recipes 
for a-f etc in the top of the disklist. 3, maybe even 4 of those might 
get it under control.  And its a technique I've not yet explored. 
>                                                               Nathan
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>------ Nathan Stratton Treadway  -  natha...@ontko.com  -  Mid-Atlantic
> region Ray Ontko & Co.  -  Software consulting services  -  
> http://www.ontko.com/ GPG Key:
> http://www.ontko.com/~nathanst/gpg_key.txt   ID: 1023D/ECFB6239 Key
> fingerprint = 6AD8 485E 20B9 5C71 231C  0C32 15F3 ADCD ECFB 6239



Copyright 2018 by Maurice E. Heskett
-- 
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

Reply via email to