On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Matěj Laitl <ma...@laitl.cz> wrote: > On 20. 8. 2012 Teo Mrnjavac wrote: >> http://wstaw.org/m/2012/08/20/plasma-desktopAH1228.png > > Good progress, but again I have to repeat myself: I will oppose merging any > rewrite that will introduce significant feature-loss regressions. Sorry. > > Such code should live in a branch until it has general feature parity (in this > case: functionality of all meaningful applets that work reliably currently > should be provided by the new CV: wikipedia, labels, lyrics, similar artists, > tabs, events, photos...), as for example my iPod Collection rewrite did. Note > that code living in a branch isn't something bad, it receives proper testing > and review from interested parties (e.g. me), but we shouldn't disappoint > uninterested parties with regressions. > > Teo, please forward this mail to Riccardo if he cannot read the list. (even if > your opinion is different, this is just a notice of my point of view) > > Cheers and keep up the good work, > Matěj
I second that. _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel
