On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Matěj Laitl <ma...@laitl.cz> wrote: > On 21. 8. 2012 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: >> On Tuesday 21 August 2012 16:07:27 Matěj Laitl wrote: >> > Then I think a good compromise could be to merge qml branch into master as >> > soon as Level 0 is reasonably completed and with confidence that >> > completing Level 1 wouldn't block the release unacceptably long. >> >> Perfect, exactly what I meant. > > Sounds like a plan, good! > >> > b) The changes create a lot of dead code. We should try (yep, not just >> > you) to remove all the code made dead by CV QMLification. Do you see how >> > current info applet adapts to currently selected media sources view? >> > There's a lot of code associated spread across code-base and it seems that >> > it's going to be dead. (or do you plan to preserve some form of this >> > functionality? Sometimes it gives nice info, but it seems hard to present >> > it in a sensible (UI-wise) way) >> >> Most of the old code is going to be dead. I'm keeping it alive in the >> development branch because it's a very helpful guidance in restructuring the >> various dataengines (they're really, really tied to C++ and custom data >> types) and porting over some existing bits. > > I see. One of the reasons I wanted to keep 2 branches, but I understand that > having 2 check-outs is less convenient than having the old code around. > > Anyways, I've glad we've reached consensus. (if other devs are of similar > thinking)
+1 Cheers, -- Teo Mrnjavac http://teom.org | t...@kde.org _______________________________________________ Amarok-devel mailing list Amarok-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-devel