Lucio Chiappetti schrieb: > This is a shorter request for clarification (see previous longer post for > details) about our attempt to replace our pure sendmail with DNSBL > filtering policy with one based on sendmail 8.13.1, amavisd-new-2.1.2 in > the "milter" configuration and spamassassin (spamd ??) 3.0.4
Why don't you use a newer version of amavisd-new? > QUESTION 0) is spamd necessary ? > Shall we run spamd or not ? No (unless amavisd-new/milter is completely different). spamd is used to eliminate the overhead of starting the spamassassin command line tool. amavisd-new uses the SpamAssassin modules directly and therefore does not use spamd. > QUESTION 3) Hits: - in syslog > We see in the mail log some "amavis Passed CLEAN" entries which have a > non-numeric spamassassin score (Hits: -). > Is this related to $sa_timeout ? Should we raise this timeout to a value > higher than default ? Will it be honoured in milter configuration ? I think "Hits: -" means that the spam scan did not run or did not complete successfully. Either you got a SpamAssassin timeout (which is noted in the logs IIRC) or you disabled spam scanning for that recipient. -- Felix _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
