On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 08:25:08AM +0200, Tobias Reckhard wrote: > > Well, without any hard data we can only speculate on what the problem > was. However, once you know the few knobs dnscache offers, it is > remarkably easy to setup. It's rather simple, which means that it's > quick to get up and running correctly and less easy to screw up than > some of the more complex an hence complicated alternatives. > It also means that some things can't be done with one instance of > dnscache alone, but by chaining them and throwing in an odd tinydns and > walldns here and there you can efficiently (IMHO) provide solutions that > cater for practically all real-world needs -- the sensible ones, that > is, there's always people who try to use their monkey wrench for everything.
So is there really any benefits in using djbdns, other than that it's from a cool author? I remember testing it once, and it seemed a bit awkward to install and use. Mainly I've used bind, maradns and currently powerdns. All of them are extremely simple to setup, from packages even more. I haven't noticed any differences in performance etc. I guess I need million queries a hour for that.. Cheers, Henrik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
