mouss wrote: > Jef Driesen wrote: >> I have a small postfix/amavis/dovecot mailserver for my home network. >> Mails are retrieved with fetchmail and delivered to postfix with amavis >> as a after-queue content filter. It works great, except that after the >> upgrade from Ubuntu 7.04 (Feisty Fawn) to 7.10 (Gutsy Gibbon), amavis >> assigns very low spamcores. >> >> An example from amavis: >> >> X-Spam-Score: 2.644 >> X-Spam-Level: ** >> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.644 tagged_above=-999 required=5 >> tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, >> SARE_SUB_CASINO=0.555, US_DOLLARS_3=0.63] >> >> When I remove all headers generated by my mailserver, and pass the >> message through spamassassin (with "spamassassin -t < spam.eml"), I get >> a much higher score: >> >> X-Spam-Flag: YES >> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on >> manta.localdomain.local >> X-Spam-Level: ***************** >> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=17.7 required=5.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN, >> HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY, >> SARE_SUB_CASINO,URIBL_BLACK,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,URIBL_RHS_DOB, >> US_DOLLARS_3 autolearn=spam version=3.2.3 >> >> pts rule name >> ---- ---------------------- >> 0.6 SARE_SUB_CASINO >> 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY >> 2.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET >> 2.5 DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN >> 1.2 US_DOLLARS_3 >> 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE >> 1.7 MIME_HTML_ONLY >> 2.9 URIBL_JP_SURBL >> 2.1 URIBL_OB_SURBL >> 2.0 URIBL_BLACK >> 0.9 URIBL_RHS_DOB >> >> If I restart amavis, the spamscore is already much higher for the same >> message (send with "sendmail user < spam.eml"), especially if the high >> negative AWL score is ignored: >> >> X-Quarantine-ID: <qQEc9Gutw-4P> >> X-Spam-Flag: YES >> X-Spam-Score: 8.12 >> X-Spam-Level: ******** >> X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 >> tests=[AWL=-5.476, >> BAYES_40=-0.185, DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN=1.495, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, >> MIME_HTML_ONLY=1.457, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, >> RCVD_IN_NJABL_PROXY=1.643, SARE_SUB_CASINO=0.555, URIBL_BLACK=1.955, >> URIBL_JP_SURBL=1.501, URIBL_OB_SURBL=1.5, URIBL_RHS_DOB=1.083, >> US_DOLLARS_3=0.63] >> >> I understand that there might be some differences between amavis and my >> spamassassin test, because they did run with a different user, but I >> think something else is wrong here. It seems that network test are only >> performed if amavis is restarted in the second try. Since all settings >> are unchanged, what could be causing this and how do I fix this? I can >> provide additional information, but didn't know what to provide already. >> > > Since IPs and domains are dynamically added to DNSBLs and URIBLs, the > example you show is "normal": some IPs and URIs have been listed since > the first run. This happens all the time. > > That said, make sure amavisd is started with the right config file. (if > the init scripts use a different config, ... etc).
I understand those lists are dynamic, but it seems that amavis never performs those network test when after booting my server. Only when I restart amavis manually, I start seeing points from the network tests in the email headers. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
