2010/6/13 Giampaolo Tomassoni <giampa...@tomassoni.biz>: > Attempting to run a sample message through the spamd channel, you only get > something like this back: > > SPAMD/1.1 0 EX_OK > Content-length: 43 > Spam: False ; -8.0 / 5.0 > > ALL_TRUSTED,LOCAL_AUTH_RCVD,TVD_SPACE_RATIO > > See? You get spam score + triggered rules name. No 'autolearn' status. So, of > course, Amavis can't say...
ok, thanks :) > Besides, is there any specific reason why you use spamd with amavis? 'cause we already have a spamd running. Anyway, is there any *real* performance difference in running spamassassin rather than spamc from amavis? Or, better question, why should I use spamassassin instead of spamc? :) thanks so much, stefano -- Stefano Sasso http://stefano.dscnet.org/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ AMaViS-user mailing list AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user Please visit http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/ regularly For administrativa requests please send email to rainer at openantivirus dot org
