Hi Deniz, Your observation is right. Ambari-186 is completely different from trunk. Hopefully it will replace it.
Regardless, I am of the opinion that this tree should be ready for consumption in 2-3 weeks. We are currently stabilizing this code base. Thank you for your interest. Regards Vikram. On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Deniz Demir wrote: > I am still hoping a response to the following questions. I am also curious > for the time table for the first release. > > Thanks, > Deniz > > > On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:59 PM, Deniz Demir wrote: > >> It looks like Ambari-186 is completely different from what is in the trunk. >> Do you mean it will replace what is currently in trunk? Or does it work with >> or on top of trunk code? >> >> I mean, what is the relationship between trunk and ambari-186 branch? >> >> Thanks, >> Deniz >> >> >> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Vitthal Suhas Gogate wrote: >> >>> Ambari-186 should be in a working state soon. Its actively developed and >>> tested at Hortonworks. Once it is working, I plan to propose merging it >>> with trunk resolving some architectural differences before making the first >>> Ambari release. >>> >>> --Suhas >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Deniz Demir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to understand Ambari and its code base, and I think I am a >>>> little confused. "trunk" is 5 months old, and all activity seems to be in >>>> branch-186, under hmc. I am wondering whether Ambari design got changed >>>> compared with what is described in the "High-level Design" section of the >>>> home page. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Deniz >>>> >> >
