Hi Deniz,

Sorry about the belated reply. We have updated the README.txt to get things 
started. We can add more documentation as things progress. 

Trunk is not in a usable state right now and as mentioned, we hope this branch 
becomes the new trunk.

Thanks
Vikram.

On Jun 7, 2012, at 9:00 PM, Deniz Demir wrote:

> Hi Vikram,
> 
> Thank you very much for your response. I am looking forward to its release. 
> Is there any design documents for Ambari-186? 
> 
> By the way, is the code in trunk usable right now? I mean, does it work?
> 
> Best,
> Deniz
> 
> 
> On Jun 7, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Vikram Dixit wrote:
> 
>> Hi Deniz,
>> 
>> Your observation is right. Ambari-186 is completely different from trunk. 
>> Hopefully it will replace it.
>> 
>> Regardless, I am of the opinion that this tree should be ready for 
>> consumption in 2-3 weeks. We are currently stabilizing this code base.
>> 
>> Thank you for your interest.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Vikram.
>> 
>> On Jun 7, 2012, at 5:47 PM, Deniz Demir wrote:
>> 
>>> I am still hoping a response to the following questions. I am also curious 
>>> for the time table for the first release.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Deniz
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:59 PM, Deniz Demir wrote:
>>> 
>>>> It looks like Ambari-186 is completely different from what is in the 
>>>> trunk. Do you mean it will replace what is currently in trunk? Or does it 
>>>> work with or on top of trunk code? 
>>>> 
>>>> I mean, what is the relationship between trunk and ambari-186 branch?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Deniz
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 6, 2012, at 10:54 PM, Vitthal Suhas Gogate wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ambari-186 should be in a working state soon. Its actively developed and
>>>>> tested at Hortonworks.  Once it is working, I plan to propose merging it
>>>>> with trunk resolving some architectural differences before making the 
>>>>> first
>>>>> Ambari release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Suhas
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:18 PM, Deniz Demir <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am trying to understand Ambari and its code base, and I think I am a
>>>>>> little confused. "trunk" is 5 months old, and all activity seems to be in
>>>>>> branch-186, under hmc. I am wondering whether Ambari design got changed
>>>>>> compared with what is described in the "High-level Design" section of the
>>>>>> home page.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Deniz
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to