2012/3/6 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]>

> Hi Maciej,
>
> thanks a lot for the update.
> As noticed as well from you this IP clearance issue seems to be a pretty
> "big deal" for the project.
> IANAL but I think it would block our first release if we can not solve it.
> And consequently this would block our potential graduation plan.
> For this reason it would be nice to have a clear picture of the current
> situation  and also from the past.
> Just to be clear my intention is only to understand and trying to move
> forward. If any of my questions would look inquisitive or "rude" I do
> apologize in advance.
> As long as I understood Leeloo was a project started under the umbrella of
> the Newcastle University.
> At a certain point you guys decided to donate to the ASF.
> Did the Newcastle University agreed at that point? If yes, does still
> agree now? If yes, :) what is the real blocker/issue? Is it more a formal
> issue?
> Is there any way we (project members/mentors) can help speed the process?
>
> Thanks a lot for your effort on it and regards
>

Thanks to you Antonio as I do have the same the concerns about this topic.
Looking forward to have a clearer view.
Tommaso



>
> Antonio
>
>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Maciej Machulak wrote:
>
> > I've sent emails to various departments at my Uni and included OSS
> > Watch to help. Since I've been in USA for some time now, unfortunately
> > I cannot go and knock on people's doors directly. I see it's a huge
> > issue and it's a total waste of the code that some other (Apache)
> > projects cannot use it. I will do my best to see if there's any update
> > on that issue and if we can move forward.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Maciej
> >
> > On 2 March 2012 05:48, Antonio Sanso <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Maciej,
> >>
> >> sorry to bother you again on it.
> >> But do you have any update ?
> >> I thinks is really time to seriously think about a release and it would
> be nice to hear that also this topic is moving forward.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Antonio
> >>
> >> On Feb 1, 2012, at 12:13 AM, Maciej Machulak wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yes, that's the correct story. AFAIK there's some progress with the
> >>> grant at the Uni. I've been told it might be issued shortly :-) I'll
> >>> keep bugging them until the grant is issued, no worries ;)
> >>>
> >>> Maciej
> >>>
> >>> On 31 January 2012 15:10, Pid <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> On 31/01/2012 22:52, Raymond Feng wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can somebody familiar with the project history summarize the code
> grant issue? It will help us new folks get the context of the discussion.
> >>>>
> >>>> Short version, (correct me if I'm wrong someone):
> >>>>
> >>>> An OAuth 2.0 project, LeeLoo, was being developed by Maciej & Lukasz
> who
> >>>> work at Newcastle Uni.  We invited them to join the project with
> their code.
> >>>>
> >>>> That code was committed to the repo before a grant was provided by
> >>>> Newcastle Uni, whose copyright is on the code.
> >>>>
> >>>> Maciej & Lukasz have been trying to get the Newcastle Uni legal people
> >>>> to complete the grant, without success so far.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> p
> >>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Raymond
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Pid wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On 31/01/2012 15:50, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Pid,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Personally I can't help on the legal issues, I think
> directions/actions
> >>>>>>> from our mentors are needed here.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I mean that if we can't get a grant, we'll have to ditch the code.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> All the same, I would like to hear what progress the guys have made
> and
> >>>>>> if there's anything any of us can do to assist - perhaps by talking
> to
> >>>>>> the relevant people.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> p
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Tommaso
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2012/1/31 Pid * <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 31 Jan 2012, at 10:15, Tommaso Teofili <
> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Not me unfortunately, I hope Lukasz or Maciej could be able to
> do that.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Should we start considering an alternative?  I am wincing as I
> say it,
> >>>>>>>> but if we can't make progress on the legal issue then we'll have
> to
> >>>>>>>> take some drastic action.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> p
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Tommaso
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2012/1/31 Antonio Sanso <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi *
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Jan 30, 2012, at 6:32 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Amber
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Any progress on the graduation issues mentioned in the last
> report?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> What's the status with the mentioned "copyright signoff from
> >>>>>>>>>>> University of Newcastle"?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> is there anyone that would be able to give an answer to Jukka
> (mail sent
> >>>>>>>>>> to general@)?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Antonio
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [key:62590808]
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>> [key:62590808]
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Maciej Machulak
> >>> email: [email protected]
> >>> cell: +1 650 468 1528 (US)
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Maciej Machulak
> > email: [email protected]
> > cell: +1 650 468 1528 (US)
>
>

Reply via email to