Hi all, to better understand the Leeloo/Newcastle University IP issue I have been dug further the mailing list. I have thought to share with you my little "chronological report" we can use in order to prepare something consistent to ask to legal@ (btw did anybody tried to do that for this issue already?):
10/10 First mention of Leeloo [0] 11/10 Introduction of Leeloo to Amber list [1] 11/10 Moving Leeloo code to Apache repository [2] 12/10 Maciej/Lukasz signed ICLA [3] 12/10 IP clearance for Leeloo contribution [4] 12/10 AMBER-11/AMBER-12 Leelo donation 07/11 IP clearance and first release [5] 09/11 Waiting from reply from the University [6] 01/12 ASF license and copyrights [7] [0] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201010.mbox/%3C4CA5A544.3040407%40pidster.com%3E [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTi%3DEp6Df48aFZdB%2BmokAp6HO7-ncmoVdjELKnzwz%40mail.gmail.com%3E [2] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201011.mbox/%3CAANLkTik3xt1H7nOaVGWPUSY9MrkKTPymffd%2BHT7r421A%40mail.gmail.com%3E [3] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikCGKnQkGj7wuHnFWoju%3DxbrO0%3DDMYWjkHfS%3DCK%40mail.gmail.com%3E [4] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201012.mbox/%3CAANLkTikHhU9gQKAJPtVfXOTrWJQM-XiTkSkBhQpWJfiz%40mail.gmail.com%3E [5] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201107.mbox/%3CCAPz8h_XGY5gpMCqVyBxYBJ%2Bg%3DuDCgj-VPttNoKyEb5H4K7JR1w%40mail.gmail.com%3E [6] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201109.mbox/%3CCA%2Bc2x_U%3DdtA9UpzpsvbrtNVypcqXEvvq6O8TEGY5D_bLm7ZXRQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E [7] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-amber-dev/201201.mbox/%3C4938690A-22C7-4677-8361-735D9A7E939D%40yahoo.com%3E Regards Antonio On Mar 14, 2012, at 2:39 PM, Antonio Sanso wrote: > Hi Simone > > On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > >> Salut a tout le monde, >> >> didn't we accept external contributions to that part, once Leelo >> codebase was accepted? >> IIRC issues were filled and patches applied on oauth2, please correct >> me if I am wrong! >> >> As a side note: Leelo's guys submitted Leelo after submitting a >> SoftwareGrant, > > after digging a bit on the mailing list history I am not too sure about that > (namely that software grant has been signed). See also [0] > Now as a next step, and here I'd ask the help of all, we'd need to collect > any information on any document that has been signed, > in order to have something specific and precise to ask to legal@ > > WDYT? > > Regards > > Antonio > > > [0] http://amber.markmail.org/message/e6rhs3tbsydal7i4 >
