On 9/9/2025 8:45 PM, Liang, Prike wrote:
[Public] Ping.. Regards, Prike-----Original Message----- From: Liang, Prike <prike.li...@amd.com> Sent: Monday, September 8, 2025 10:40 AM To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Deucher, Alexander <alexander.deuc...@amd.com>; Kuehling, Felix <felix.kuehl...@amd.com>; Liang, Prike <prike.li...@amd.com> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdkfd: pass the PD BOs directly for PA Since the PD BOs are assigned at initialization, the placement stage can obtain the PD physical address (PA) directly from the PD BOs without additional lookups. Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <prike.li...@amd.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c index 260165bbe373..fd9cbbebbdf4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c @@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static int vm_validate_pt_pd_bos(struct amdgpu_vm *vm, return ret; } - vm->pd_phys_addr = amdgpu_gmc_pd_addr(vm->root.bo); + vm->pd_phys_addr = amdgpu_gmc_pd_addr(pd);
Does it fix bug or is just cosmetic change? pd and vm->root.bo should be same.
Regards Xiaogang
return 0; } -- 2.34.1
