> -----Original Message-----
> From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of
> Christian K?nig
> Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 2:33 AM
> To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix old fence check in amdgpu_fence_emit
> 
> We don't hold a reference to the old fence, so it can go away any time we are
> waiting for it to signal.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++-
> ------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> index ee47c11e92ce..4dee2326b29c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c
> @@ -136,8 +136,9 @@ int amdgpu_fence_emit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> struct dma_fence **f,  {
>       struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>       struct amdgpu_fence *fence;
> -     struct dma_fence *old, **ptr;
> +     struct dma_fence __rcu **ptr;
>       uint32_t seq;
> +     int r;
> 
>       fence = kmem_cache_alloc(amdgpu_fence_slab, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (fence == NULL)
> @@ -153,15 +154,24 @@ int amdgpu_fence_emit(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> struct dma_fence **f,
>                              seq, flags | AMDGPU_FENCE_FLAG_INT);
> 
>       ptr = &ring->fence_drv.fences[seq & ring-
> >fence_drv.num_fences_mask];
> +     if (unlikely(rcu_dereference_protected(*ptr, 1))) {

Isn't this line redundant with dma_fence_get_rcu_safe? I think it's unnecessary.
Otherwise looks ok to me.

-David
> +             struct dma_fence *old;
> +
> +             rcu_read_lock();
> +             old = dma_fence_get_rcu_safe(ptr);
> +             rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +             if (old) {
> +                     r = dma_fence_wait(old, false);
> +                     dma_fence_put(old);
> +                     if (r)
> +                             return r;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
>       /* This function can't be called concurrently anyway, otherwise
>        * emitting the fence would mess up the hardware ring buffer.
>        */
> -     old = rcu_dereference_protected(*ptr, 1);
> -     if (old && !dma_fence_is_signaled(old)) {
> -             DRM_INFO("rcu slot is busy\n");
> -             dma_fence_wait(old, false);
> -     }
> -
>       rcu_assign_pointer(*ptr, dma_fence_get(&fence->base));
> 
>       *f = &fence->base;
> --
> 2.17.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to