-----Original Message----- From: Liang, Prike <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 4:43 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Quan, Evan <[email protected]>; Feng, Kenneth <[email protected]>; Huang, Ray <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Liang, Prike <[email protected]> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] drm/amd/powerplay: add the interfaces for getting and setting profiling dpm clock level
implement get_profiling_clk_mask and force_clk_levels for forcing dpm clk to limit value. Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c index f87aa56..c6aae1c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/renoir_ppt.c @@ -392,6 +392,87 @@ static int renoir_get_workload_type(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t profile) return pplib_workload; } +static int renoir_get_profiling_clk_mask(struct smu_context *smu, + enum amd_dpm_forced_level level, + uint32_t *sclk_mask, + uint32_t *mclk_mask, + uint32_t *soc_mask) +{ + + if (level == AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_MIN_SCLK) { + if (sclk_mask) + *sclk_mask = 0; + } else if (level == AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_MIN_MCLK) { + if (mclk_mask) + *mclk_mask = 0; + } else if (level == AMD_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_PROFILE_PEAK) { + if(sclk_mask) + /* The sclk as gfxclk and has three level about max/min/current */ + *sclk_mask = 3 - 1; + + if(mclk_mask) + *mclk_mask = NUM_MEMCLK_DPM_LEVELS - 1; + + if(soc_mask) + *soc_mask = NUM_SOCCLK_DPM_LEVELS - 1; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int renoir_force_clk_levels(struct smu_context *smu, + enum smu_clk_type clk_type, uint32_t mask) { + + int ret = 0 ; + uint32_t soft_min_level = 0, soft_max_level = 0, min_freq = 0, max_freq = 0; + DpmClocks_t *clk_table = smu->smu_table.clocks_table; + + soft_min_level = mask ? (ffs(mask) - 1) : 0; + soft_max_level = mask ? (fls(mask) - 1) : 0; + + switch (clk_type) { + case SMU_GFXCLK: + case SMU_SCLK: + ret = smu_get_dpm_freq_range(smu, SMU_GFXCLK, &min_freq, &max_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetSoftMaxGfxClk, max_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetHardMinGfxClk, min_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; [Quan, Evan] It seems user requested soft_min_level and soft_max_level are actually not applied. Please verify this by setting " pp_dpm_sclk" sysfs interface. + break; + case SMU_SOCCLK: + GET_DPM_CUR_FREQ(clk_table, clk_type, soft_min_level, min_freq); + GET_DPM_CUR_FREQ(clk_table, clk_type, soft_max_level, max_freq); + ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetSoftMaxSocclkByFreq, max_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetHardMinSocclkByFreq, min_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; + break; + case SMU_MCLK: + case SMU_FCLK: + GET_DPM_CUR_FREQ(clk_table, clk_type, soft_min_level, min_freq); + GET_DPM_CUR_FREQ(clk_table, clk_type, soft_max_level, max_freq); + ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetSoftMaxFclkByFreq, max_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; + ret = smu_send_smc_msg_with_param(smu, SMU_MSG_SetHardMinFclkByFreq, min_freq); + if (ret) + return ret; + + break; + default: + break; + } + + return ret; +} + static const struct pptable_funcs renoir_ppt_funcs = { .get_smu_msg_index = renoir_get_smu_msg_index, .get_smu_table_index = renoir_get_smu_table_index, @@ -404,6 +485,8 @@ static const struct pptable_funcs renoir_ppt_funcs = { .force_dpm_limit_value = renoir_force_dpm_limit_value, .unforce_dpm_levels = renoir_unforce_dpm_levels, .get_workload_type = renoir_get_workload_type, + .get_profiling_clk_mask = renoir_get_profiling_clk_mask, + .force_clk_levels = renoir_force_clk_levels, }; void renoir_set_ppt_funcs(struct smu_context *smu) -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
