That's a good point for simplifying  the code and will send another patch for 
this.

Thanks,
Prike
From: Wang, Kevin(Yang) <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 5:22 PM
To: Liang, Prike <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; Huang, Ray <[email protected]>; Quan, Evan 
<[email protected]>; Feng, Kenneth <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] drm/amd/powerplay: bypass dpm_context null pointer 
check guard for some smu series

the smu driver many place will use AMD_IS_APU flags,
i think we'd better add a new member "is_apu" in smu_context"

Best Regards,
kevin

________________________________
From: amd-gfx 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Liang, Prike <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 4:43 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Huang, Ray 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Liang, Prike 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Quan, Evan 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Feng, Kenneth 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] drm/amd/powerplay: bypass dpm_context null pointer check 
guard for some smu series

For now APU has no smu_dpm_context structure for containing default/current 
related dpm table,
thus will not initialize smu_dpm_context and aviod null pointer check guard for 
APU.

Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 10 +++++++---
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
index 90fa444..3afd2cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
@@ -1554,7 +1554,9 @@ static int smu_enable_umd_pstate(void *handle,

         struct smu_context *smu = (struct smu_context*)(handle);
         struct smu_dpm_context *smu_dpm_ctx = &(smu->smu_dpm);
-       if (!smu->pm_enabled || !smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_context)
+       struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;
+
+       if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) && (!smu->pm_enabled || 
!smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_context))
                 return -EINVAL;

         if (!(smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_level & profile_mode_mask)) {
@@ -1751,8 +1753,9 @@ enum amd_dpm_forced_level 
smu_get_performance_level(struct smu_context *smu)
 {
         struct smu_dpm_context *smu_dpm_ctx = &(smu->smu_dpm);
         enum amd_dpm_forced_level level;
+       struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;

-       if (!smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_context)
+       if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) && !smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_context)
                 return -EINVAL;

         mutex_lock(&(smu->mutex));
@@ -1766,8 +1769,9 @@ int smu_force_performance_level(struct smu_context *smu, 
enum amd_dpm_forced_lev
 {
         struct smu_dpm_context *smu_dpm_ctx = &(smu->smu_dpm);
         int ret = 0;
+       struct amdgpu_device *adev = smu->adev;

-       if (!smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_context)
+       if (!(adev->flags & AMD_IS_APU) && !smu_dpm_ctx->dpm_context)
                 return -EINVAL;

         ret = smu_enable_umd_pstate(smu, &level);
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to