One of the strengths of AB / AFL is Exploration.  It allows one to 
see the intermediate results of what one is doing in an easily 
readable format bar by bar thus to a large degree demystifying 
what's happening.  This can answer a lot of questions about why 100 
lines down in some piece of AFL the desired results weren't 
obtained.  The difference for the most part between those who get it 
and those who don't with straight forward AFL is in the use of built 
in tools like this.

For more advanced stuff like possibly what's going on inside loops 
or custom backtester there is always _Trace which can possibly 
provide more detailed information in a possibly slightly less 
friendly manner.

--- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "mytakeismine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> Maybe I shouldn't jump in, however... 
> I know what I would like to see and I think after reading others 
> comments that they too would like to see Not More Canned 
indicators 
> and the like but better documentation along the way. Possibly more 
> examples but even they don't help if you don't get some of the 
> concepts. 
> 
> For all of you that "Get It" and understand it, you can look at, 
read 
> it and implement. Not so for some of us who still love to trade 
and 
> want to learn AFL and AMI. Now I love to learn new things yet I do 
> suffer from a slight learning disability but when I finally get 
> something I run with it.
> 
> Ok I have asked the question and have received good answers as to 
> where to obtain the knowledge. I bought C++ Demystified, OOP 
> Demystified and Howard's new book Quantitative Trading. I have to 
> admit I haven't read any of them all the way through (more than 
half 
> for the first 2) but I wasn't getting it. (I don't have C++ so 
> reading with out using fell short.)
> 
> So IS there a prerequisite to AMI? Does every one but Me get it? 
Do I 
> want it dumbed down? NO. But maybe a poll should be taken "How 
> comfortable are you with AMI" 
> 
> The answer for me would be a "Code" tutorial that teaches hands on 
> syntax for use with arrays (for that is the strength of AMI?) and 
> help files setting for skilled and unskilled where unskilled may 
dive 
> deeper.
> 
> I could keep going but much too long already!
> 
> Thanks Tomasz for all your good work.
> It will sink in for me at some point.
> 
> Cheers
> Kim J
> mytakeismine
>


Reply via email to