Why not normalize volume by 000 / week, month, Qtr or
whatever?

Joseph Biran
____________________________________________

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz
Janeczko
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.18.0 BETA released
(Example for CategorySetName)

Hello,

Example for CategorySetName:

CategorySetName( "My watch list", categoryWatchList, 1 );

As for volume field - it will become floating point (so max
will be 10^37) in 5.21 or so.
As for traded value - it is mostly unavailable from data
sources. You can however get pretty close approximation by
multiplying ( Avg * Volume ).

Best regards,
Tomasz Janeczko
amibroker.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "sumangalam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 4:19 PM
Subject: [amibroker] Re: AmiBroker 5.18.0 BETA released


> Thanks Mr. Janeczko,
> 
> This version solves one more problem also, which you have
been 
> reticent to mention in the change log : Quarterly and
Yearly charts 
> now handle PlotShapes nicely, earlier versions did not.
Please accept 
> my thanks for it.
> 
> It will be nice if you please give a code example of
CategorySetName(). 
> I understand you have added feature to do via AFL 
> what we used to do manually via SYMBOL > Categories > Edit
name. Can 
> you please confirm if this thing can be implemented via
OLE also ?
> 
> I remember sometime ago you had asked for suggestions for
improvements  
> in charting area of the program. I am not sure if my
suggestion is 
> limited to charting segment of the program, however, it
will be very 
> nice if you can please add support for BIG volume values
in native 
> Amibroker database without need for dividing by 100 or
1000 
> etc.(Quarterly and Yearly charts happen to have big
volumes). 
> Secondly, it will be nice to have support for Traded Value
in addition 
> to Traded Quantity(Volume) in the Native Amibroker
database.
> 
> Thanks again for the new version.
> 
> With Regards
> 
> Sanjiv Bansal

Reply via email to