I may have missed something here amongst all the messages and I really am not too familiar with the BC610 but I thought it had variable loading with an adjustable 3-4 turn link. If so, it should be able to load into a fairly wide range of loads. On my variable link rig I can go down to about 10 ohms load by pulling the link out to maintain the proper plate current, but with the link in all the way the proper loading (indicated by plate current)is reached when the load is about 100 ohms. Of course if the load is 10 ohms and the link pulled out for proper plate current I need to be very careful not to pour the coals on with the plate voltage or the link will over heat. I have been able to load to proper plate current with a 300 ohm load but I had to parallel tune my link instead of series tune. As for SWR bridges, I think many people get the properties of loads and sources mixed up. All the SWR meters I have measure the match between the line and the load and they don't give a hoot about the source as long as there is no reactance in the line from the source. SWR is defined as the ratio of transmission line to load. Not source to line. Given the scenario of a XMITER (say 100 watts) that has been adjusted to match a 50 ohm dummy load on a 1/2 wave length of coax cable and the SWR meter is at the load end of the cable. If the load resistance is increase to 100 ohms the SWR meter should show 2:1 and the transmitter should have 1/2 output RF current, Hence 1/2 power. If the transmitters load is adjusted to compensate and bring the RF current and plate current back up to normal it will be putting out 100 watts again. But the SWR meter should still show 2:1. The 100 ohm load will get all must a hot as the 50 ohm load and in many cases you will not be able to tell the difference in temperature. If there is a slight difference it will be caused by the slight increase in loss of the transmission line due to the SWR of 2:1. This is generally not of any consequence on 80 or 40 meters. For the most part the load is still getting the 100 watts even though it is 100 ohms instead of 50 ohms. By the same token many SWR meters that are not at the load end of the cable may not give the correct reading and especially if the source is not a resistive output as most transmitters are not unless they or pre adjusted with the desired load attached with a very short cable. The reason I said a 1/2 wave length of coax in the above scenario, is because that with a 1/2 wave length (must take in effect of slow velocity of coax) the value of load resistance is reflected at the source. At a 1/4 wave length is either multiplied of divided by the SWR depending on whether the load is greater that the line characteristic impedance or less than it. Of course if the SWR is 1:1 then it doesn't matter how long the line is or where you measure it. The only need I have found for an SWR meter is, as an indicator of the tuning of an antenna tuner for random length wire or balanced line doublets. Also many solid state radios have no tuning built in and can only work right into a 50 ohm non reactive load. In this case a PI type tuner for coax fed antennas is very useful for fine tuning to the proper load. (Basically, it takes the place of an internal tune and load procedure, as older tube type radios had.) The SWR meter is a good indicator to use when it is placed at the input of the tuner and the transmitter has been pre-tuned into a 50 ohm dummy load. When the antenna tuner is adjusted correctly, as indicated by the SWR meter, the transmitter will be loaded just as it was with the dummy load and will not have to be retuned. SEE http://www.qsl.net/wa5bxo/swr/swr.htm John, WA5BXO
RE: [AMRadio] BC-610 terminating impedance
John Coleman ARS WA5BXO Sat, 29 Oct 2005 22:24:06 -0400 (EDT)
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-610 do... James M. Walker
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... W5OMR/Geoff
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... Mike Sawyer
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... Donald Chester
- [AMRadio] BC-610 te... Rbethman
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... Jim Candela
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... k0ng
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... Jim Wilhite
- [AMRadio] Ozona Bob... Brian K Harris
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... Barrie Smith
- RE: [AMRadio] BC-61... John Coleman ARS WA5BXO
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-61... W5OMR/Geoff
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up James M. Walker
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up rbethman
- RE: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up and burnt't... John E. Coleman (ARS WA5BXO)
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up and bur... W5OMR/Geoff
- RE: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up and... John E. Coleman (ARS WA5BXO)
- RE: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up and bur... Donald Chester
- Re: [AMRadio] BC-610 down=up W7QHO