Brian Carling wrote:
On 23 Feb 2006 at 9:47, UVCM INC wrote:
Ron,
I have experience in politics and running companies, would like to chat with
you about legal action, sometimes its the only way. or maybe their are other
ways if the ARRL would listen to us and modify there position.
Brad KB7FQR
Brad don't hold your breath to see THAT happen...
The ARRL Directors and top brass have demonstrated
an incredible level of intransigence, and treachery against
the clearly communicated will of the majority of radio amateurs.
They have dug in to this amazingly stupid position for some
time now. I don't expect them to change one bit. The fact of the
matter is that ARRL is broken! We need something else with
some integrity to replace ARRL, or at least to become a
viable alternative until such time as we amateurs who still
love and value the hobby can see this obsolete, self-perpetuating
old boys' club deposed.
I know many are still holding out hope that the League can be
reformed.
All I see is that it gets worse and worse all the time.
______________________________________________________________
AMR
Absolutely correct. I strongly object to them dubbing themselves "The National
Organization for Amateur Radio." The membership is a small percentage of Amateur
Radio, and the3y represent only a small percentage of that.( Mainly Winlink users).
--
_ _ _ _ _
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ John L. Sielke
( W ) ( 2 ) ( A ) ( G ) ( N ) http://w2agn.net
\_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/
"CRUSTY OLD CURMUDGEON - AND PROUD OF IT!"
