Larry, as Brian said no one I know stopped the topic. As one of the
other moderators, I did not. I know you post pertinent topics from time
to time and contribute to the group in a positive way. I, too, hope you
reconsider leaving.
To everyone else, I suggest that if any meaning outside the subject line
is added anywhere in the post, then change the subject line to reflect
that change so those of us who do not wish to read a topic will know.
In that way, one can delete topics they do not wish to read. If you
wish to post to a topic and comment about something else, please make it
two separate posts. Maybe that will help.
Jim/W5JO
Moderator
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Will" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service"
<amradio@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Rinaldo's bandwidth suggestion
I thought the moderator put this whole thread to BED.
ENOUGH ALREADY!!!!!!
W3LW
At 05:47 PM 11/29/2007, you wrote:
Frankly I don't care which among ARRL officials passed
along a specific bandwidth number at the IARU
conference in Brazil.
______________________________________________________________
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.
