AMEN. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Darin Cowan" <yet.another.sq...@gmail.com> To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org> Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:17 PM Subject: [amsat-bb] Evidence of moon landings....!
> Which is more reasonable: > > 1. That a 40 year grand conspiracy involving literally thousands of people > from multiple, antagonistic countries, could pull off and maintain the > illusion that nobody has walked on the moon. Recognizing that the Soviet > Union and China both would have benefitted greatly for exposing such > fakery, > and recognizing that the US government by itself - let alone all the other > people, organizations, and governments that have a stake in it - can't > keep > even a little secret like "I went to Argentina to get a piece on the > side". > Recognizing all the photographs, the rocks, the satellites, the orbiters, > the explosion of technology and so forth. Recognizing that the > governments > in question have been unable, in the same time period, to keep their > leaders > from being shot at by simple lunatics, and that those governments haven't > even been able to construct a convincing lie about WMD in the middle-east: > something that really, everyone would believe with little effort? > > OR > > 2. That men have actually been on the moon as reported? > > The whole idea that the moon landings were faked is, quite simply, > weapons-grade stupid. It flies in the face of logic and reason. No > moon-conspiracy theorist has ever been able to produce a shred of evidence > that anything has been faked... a task that should be INCREDIBLY easy > given > the number of people that have to be involved to this day. Scientists, on > the other hand have produced photos, rocks, and mountains of other > evidence, > not the least of which is the dozen people who have actually been there, a > good many of which are still walking around. > > People who still tout this moon-landing-fake conspiracy are nutters, plain > and simple. There are many places I'd expect to find woo-woo conspiracy > believers, but never on the AMSAT list. > > Can we please put this issue to bed and go back to satellites and radio > now. > > -VE3OIJ > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
