Jim Leder wrote: > AMEN. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Darin Cowan" <yet.another.sq...@gmail.com> > To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org> > Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 7:17 PM > Subject: [amsat-bb] Evidence of moon landings....! > > > >> Which is more reasonable: >> >> 1. That a 40 year grand conspiracy involving literally thousands of people >> from multiple, antagonistic countries, could pull off and maintain the >> illusion that nobody has walked on the moon. Recognizing that the Soviet >> Union and China both would have benefitted greatly for exposing such >> fakery, >> and recognizing that the US government by itself - let alone all the other >> people, organizations, and governments that have a stake in it - can't >> keep >> even a little secret like "I went to Argentina to get a piece on the >> side". >> Recognizing all the photographs, the rocks, the satellites, the orbiters, >> the explosion of technology and so forth. Recognizing that the >> governments >> in question have been unable, in the same time period, to keep their >> leaders >> from being shot at by simple lunatics, and that those governments haven't >> even been able to construct a convincing lie about WMD in the middle-east: >> something that really, everyone would believe with little effort? >> >> OR >> >> 2. That men have actually been on the moon as reported? >> >> The whole idea that the moon landings were faked is, quite simply, >> weapons-grade stupid. It flies in the face of logic and reason. No >> moon-conspiracy theorist has ever been able to produce a shred of evidence >> that anything has been faked... a task that should be INCREDIBLY easy >> given >> the number of people that have to be involved to this day. Scientists, on >> the other hand have produced photos, rocks, and mountains of other >> evidence, >> not the least of which is the dozen people who have actually been there, a >> good many of which are still walking around. >> >> People who still tout this moon-landing-fake conspiracy are nutters, plain >> and simple. There are many places I'd expect to find woo-woo conspiracy >> believers, but never on the AMSAT list. >> >> Can we please put this issue to bed and go back to satellites and radio >> now. >> >> -VE3OIJ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > I for one wholeheartedly agree. Lets get on with real things, satellites and radios.
Dale - kl7xj _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
