You raise the question of licensing 'in-orbit' devices and the potential legality of such.
I guess, like some others, I'm unclear how licensing for such projects, Cubesats and the like, comes about? The recent announcement of the UK's FUNcube project will presumably require a licence from OFCOM if it is to be truly UK attributed. This will surely be a first for them (OFCOM) in the amateur field and in an area of amateur licensing not defined in the current regulations. David G8OQW ********** -----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Trevor . Sent: 04 August 2009 18:01 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Tubesat, a $4,000 launch opportunity --- On Tue, 4/8/09, Lee McLamb <ku...@cfl.rr.com> wrote: > > The blurb says the transceiver is in the 902-928MHz or 2.4-2.4835.GHz > > This growing notion of flying unlicensed devices in orbit > is on very questionable legal ground in my personal opinion. And of course outside of North America 902-915 MHz is used for Cell Phones and satellite signals don't respect national boundaries. 73 Trevor M5AKA _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
