Thanks Ted. I uploaded about 30 contacts following those instructions. All worked fine. 73 Bill K3SV
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted" <k7trkra...@charter.net> To: "'Bill Gillenwater'" <gil...@pa.net>; "'Jeff Yanko'" <wb3...@cox.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 4:53 PM Subject: RE: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW > Bill, here are all the answers: > > http://www.arrl.org/files/file/LoTW%20Instructions/N5JB.pdf > > note the satellite name has to be exact, hyphens and caps > > GL, Ted > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Gillenwater [mailto:gil...@pa.net] > Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 11:57 AM > To: Ted; 'Jeff Yanko'; amsat-bb@amsat.org > Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW > > Is there a logging standard that will make sure that LOTW finds the > "match"? > > I know the time does not have to be dead-on, but what other fields are a > must? Does anyone know, or is there a document that tells the satellite > community what needs to be in the log? If I work AO-51 for example, what > are > > the minimum number of fields that must be in the ADI (upload) file? > thanks 73 Bill K3SV > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ted" <k7trkra...@charter.net> > To: "'Jeff Yanko'" <wb3...@cox.net>; <amsat-bb@amsat.org> > Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 2:14 PM > Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW > > >> Jeff, 9 out of 189 here....I'm sure our numbers will go up as people >> upload >> their logs properly >> >> 73, Ted >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jeff Yanko [mailto:wb3...@cox.net] >> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 1:40 AM >> To: Ted; amsat-bb@amsat.org >> Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: VUCC & LoTW >> >> Hi Ted and all, >> >> I got the LoTW VUCC set up without a problem. I had already uploaded 545 >> satellite QSOs over the past couple of years so they were waiting to be >> used. Well, after getting everything in order I have a grand total >> of.....21 matches, or 3.85% of my satellite log. With LoTW VUCC now >> active >> it will hopefully get those with electronic logging to upload their >> satellite QSO's, even better, to get those with paper logs to convert to >> electronic logging, go back and enter QSO's from the previous couple >> years, >> to take advantage of this service. After seeing this disappointing >> results, >> >> I know we, in the Amateur Satellite community, can do better. >> >> >> 73, >> >> Jeff WB3JFS >> Las Vegas, NV >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. >> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite >> program! >> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb > > > _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
