Some mysteries are meant to be unsolved........ :-) Stefan, VE4NSA
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Andre <s...@pe1rdw.demon.nl> wrote: > Op 28-1-2012 0:58, Bob Bruninga schreef: > >> The TOCALL of RK3KPK could also be a Mic-E formatted packet at a >> Latitude of 3K 3K.0K in the format DD MM.mmN where message bits >> determine if the digit is a digit in the call or a letter. But in my >> quick look, I don't see any way that a "K" can appear. The letters P >> though Y can appear if the message bits are set. And the letters A >> through J can appear if a CUSTOM message is set. But I don't see a way >> for K to be set. Though someone may have a glitch in their Mic-E >> encoding algorithm. But then since this is a Kantronics, it would not >> be generating a Mic-E packet anyway... So, close but no-cigar... Maybe >> Lynn who has coded Mic-E more recently than I can see it... Bob, Wb4APR > > it's not likely to be a mic-e packet because it is not an UI frame but an UA > frame, in this case an ackowladge to a SABM frame or connect request. > > RK3KPK connected the digi, but that does not solve who RK3KPK is and why he > did it. > > 73 Andre PE1RDW > > _______________________________________________ > Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. > Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! > Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
