Colin,

I can confirm that DANDE is object 39267, 2013-055C.

So now the following IDs for the objects of the Falcon 9 launch
are certain:
39265, 2013-055A is Cassiope
39266, 2013-055B is CUSat 1&2
39267, 2013-055C is DANDE
39268, 2013-055D is POPACS (1,2 or 3)
39269, 2013-055E is POPACS (1,2 or 3)
39270, 2013-055F is POPACS (1,2 or 3)
39271, 2013-055G is Falcon 9 R/B.

73,
Nico PA0DLO


On 2013-10-08 11:54, Colin Hurst wrote:
Nico,
Thanks to some good work by Tetsu JA0CAW, DANDE is currently a good fit to
Object C.
2013-055C
1 39267U 13055C   13280.88171839  .00006188  00000-0  21045-3 0    45
2 39267  80.9931 307.0850 0796581 135.6654 231.1187 13.96656656  1151
Downlink is nominally 436748.7 MHz at my QTH.
73
Colin VK5HI.
PS: CUSAT remains a good fit with Object B.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nico Janssen [mailto:ham...@xs4all.nl]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2013 05:59
To: bstguitar...@gmail.com
Cc: Colin Hurst; Amsat BB
Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?


Detailed doppler shift measurements show that CUSat is either object 39266
or object 39271. Object 39271 appears to be officially identified as the
second stage of the Falcon rocket. If that is true then object 39266,
2013-055B, is CUSat.

On October 6 around 19:30 UTC I measured a pass of CUSat and found that the
difference between CUSat and object 39266 was about 6 seconds, using the
elements set with epoch 13277.72822065.
Besides object 39271 no other objects were near CUSat.

https://thumb6.wuala.com/previewImage/SharedInfo/Space/20131006_1930_CUSat.j
pg/?key=IZKufoz9U1Uo

73,
Nico PA0DLO


On 2013-10-03 19:07, Bryce Salmi wrote:
Looks like the DANDE website officially uses 2013-055B too!

http://spacegrant.colorado.edu/images/DANDECelestrakTLE.txt


On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Colin Hurst <cjhu...@bigpond.net.au>
wrote:

Alan & Bryce,
2013-055B appears currently to be the best fit for both DANDE and CUSAT.
73
Colin VK5HI

-----Original Message-----
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org]
On Behalf Of Alan
Sent: Wednesday, 2 October 2013 04:27
To: bstguitar...@gmail.com; 'Amsat BB'
Cc: CC
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Cornell CUSat Keps?

Bryce,

I ran the Keps for all the objects.  Space-Track shows something like
20, which is interesting.  They are already widely dispersed, so
given the low transmission rate, it might be better to wait a few
days until at least some tentative identifications are made.  I
expect DK3WN is on the case.  :)

73s,

Alan
WA4SCA


<-----Original Message-----
<From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org
<[mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Bryce Salmi
<Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2013 12:46 PM
<To: Amsat BB
<Subject: [amsat-bb] Cornell CUSat Keps?
<
<Does anyone know the designator and/or keps for the recently
launched <CUSat? Maybe I should stick roughly with any of the keps
for the recent <SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket body? My friend worked on
CUSat and I'd <really like <to catch a pass of it and show him it
operating in orbit!
<
<Thanks,
<
<Bryce
<KB1LQC
<_______________________________________________
<Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of <the
author.
<Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur <satellite
program!
<Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
<

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite
program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb





_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to