Drew,
I was once a member of AMSAT when I felt it was representing my interest however I don't feel that way anymore so I now choose to spend my hobby dollars somewhere else. That's my perogative. I "voted" against some of the decisions made by spending my money elsewhere. Of course when you express an attitude like you just did simply because someone has a differing opinion on what the sat hobby should be about then that doesn't exactly " warm" my checkbook towards AMSAT either. You guys can't apparently can't take any criticism . You're all right and the rest of us are wrong. Must be nice to live in such a black and white world. I mean how dare us insignificant non members have the audacity to doubt the all might AMSAT right?
Michael, W4HIJ
On 1/26/2014 12:22 PM, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
The last satellite AMSAT-NA built and flew was an SDR based linear transponder. 
Fox-1 and RadFXsat are FM, and the comms capability got us the launches for 
free. Fox-2 will be a SDR based transponder. At current count AMSAT orgs have 
four operable transponder satellites, another in orbit awaiting  activation, 
one at the launch site, and one lonely FM satellite built by the Saudis almost 
a decade ago.

That seems pretty balanced and forward thinking to me. Maybe your research is 
faulty.

However, as one of the "idiots" routinely doing hamfest demonstrations and 
volunteering way too much for the org, and a Life Member of AMSAT, your opinion as a 
non-member means almost nothing to me.

73, Drew KO4MA


Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 26, 2014, at 11:48 AM, Michael <mat...@charter.net> wrote:

I wasn't going to touch this  as I've made my opinion about P3-E known before 
but I can't be silent about some other things.  I don't believe it will ever 
fly because of the economic realities of today's world but hey, stranger things 
have happened.  Cubesats seem to be the wave of the future as they are more 
affordable to get launched but if you ask me we are still going in the wrong 
direction with them in a couple of areas. AMSAT seems to be bent and determined 
to keep building and flying FM repeaters even when ground based FM repeaters 
are slowly falling into disuse  and projects like Funcube AO-73 are showing how 
viable linear transponder cubesats are. There also seems to be some continued 
fascination with showing how we can all stand out in the frigid cold or the 
blazing sun balancing an HT in one hand and a handheld yagi in the other to 
work the flying repeaters....... YAWN!!! The novelty of that has worn off just 
as quickly as it did on exchanging nothing but grid !
squares and calls  and calling it a sat QSO. The focus not only needs to be on more linear 
transponder cubesats and developing  new and efficient ways to communicate with them but also on 
developing affordable ground equipment  like complete SDR transceiver systems along the lines of 
the funcube dongle except maybe abandoning the "dongle" concept and going more with a 
desktop "black box" approach. A computer driven SDR base station with tracking and 
doppler correction and digital and CW as well as voice mode communication is infinitely more 
interesting to me than  seeing some idiot balancing an antenna and an HT at a hamfest. Just my 
opinion.... That and five bucks will get you a fancy Starbucks coffee blend but I had to put it out 
there!
73,
Michael, W4HIJ
On 1/25/2014 2:44 PM, i8cvs wrote:
Hi John, W0JAB

At the moment there is no hope to see again a satellite like AO40

If we are like in the future probably we will see P3E, a satellite
similar to OSCAR-13 built by AMSAT-DL

73" de

i8CVS Domenico

----- Original Message -----
From: "John Becker" <w0...@big-river.net>
To: <amsat-bb@amsat.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 8:01 PM
Subject: [amsat-bb] status


Whats the status of a replacement for the likes of AO 40?

I know I ask this from time to time but never seem to see anything.

I for one would very much like to see this type the a boat load
of small FM only type while there is still a place to park one.

John, W0JAB

_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



_______________________________________________
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

Reply via email to