I ask about that yearly at Dayton. The answers, when not blank expressions, are along the lines of "Satellite operators already know this, and are a tiny fraction of our market compared to APRS." Obviously my suggestion that adding the phrase "Full Duplex Satellite Capable" might increase that fraction has fallen on deaf ears.
Alan WA4SCA <-----Original Message----- <From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org <[mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On Behalf Of Paul Stoetzer <Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2014 12:15 PM <To: Mike Murphree <Cc: Clint Bradford; amsat-bb@amsat.org <Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Wouxun KG-UV8D < <No idea why it's not in the literature, but it definitely is <full duplex, <just like the earlier models of the D7 series. < <73, < <Paul, N8HM < < <On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Mike Murphree <m...@tropo.org> wrote: < <> <> <> On Saturday, April 12, 2014, Paul Stoetzer <n...@arrl.net> wrote: <> <>> Just the Kenwood TH-D72A. <>> <>> 73, <>> <>> Paul, N8HM <>> <>> <>> <> If the Kenwood is full-duplex, why don't they claim that <anywhere in their <> literature? <> <> Mike N4MHO <> <_______________________________________________ <Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of <the author. <Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur <satellite program! <Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb < _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
