I agree with Karel about setting "leavejoinsinchat" default to false, but there is a problem if I send a message before the SB is open, there is high probability to get an "unable to deliver" error. For me it's not a great problem, I just wait to press enter, but most users don't understand why it should be so. maybe the message should be buffered to be sent when the SB is open, or is it already so, but not always working? I'm behind a NAT, sometimes very slow, maybe it depends on that...
2007/2/23, Boris Faure (aka billiob) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I do agree. > It may also fix some issues we have, which make us using mutex. > > On 2/23/07, Karel Demeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (2nd try ;)) > > > > 2007/2/23, NoWhereMan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Youness Alaoui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > people want it because they think it's annoying when a SB is closed and > > > > they have to wait for the user to rejoin > > > > the conversation everytime they write a message if they had to wait 1 > > > > minute... especially for low connection > > > > people, it might be a hassle.. > > > > > > Yeah, that's a point, but it still make me think that maybe it's the > > > reason > > > for which that message should be hidden (by default, and activable) :/ > > > > > I agree here strongly. We shouldn't overload 'normal' users with > > messages that don't say much. I still think we should be able to turn > > 'm on. Maybe as a plugin, maybe as a preference. But by default the > > only thing of this kind that could be shown is : > > when a SB is not open and you send a message it could not show it in > > the chatwindow and have a "Sending message ..." string in the > > statusbar untill the SB is open and then put the message in the > > chatwindow history part. Or, place the message in the chatwindow, > > with appended at it a "[Sending ....]" string that dissapears once the > > SB got opened. This is handyu to normal users asthey can see the lag > > than (especially on low connections). For other cases I don't think > > the majority of users care if the SB is opened or not. For users that > > allways close the CW, it willshow a "sending..." everytime though, > > therefor I think it's best to have it in the statusbar instead of in > > the CW; SO, I'm for putting a "Sending message ..." string in > > statusbar as long as the SB is not opened. > > > > Karel. > > > > -- > Boris FAURE (aka billiob) > mail, msn : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > No trees were killed in the sending of this message. > However, a large number of electrons were terribly > agitated. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Amsn-devel mailing list > Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Amsn-devel mailing list Amsn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amsn-devel
